Part of
my philosophy of history is that the purpose of studying history is to learn
from the past. I would argue that the tendency for the historian to focus on
the importance of knowing facts and dates is a detriment to the study of
history. Too often the historian makes the focus of history the memorizing
facts and dates and who was who, often getting caught up in the minutiae of
history. There is nothing wrong with facts, dates, and knowing who historical
figures are, the issue is when a historian makes knowing facts about the past
the purpose of studying history. In my view, the importance of history is in
learning from the past, not simply learning about it. I see very little point
in studying the past for the sake of knowing the past; there is no practicality
in that. Studying the past for the sake of itself can be very enjoyable of
course, but it should not be the historian's priority. I see the importance of
history in the lessons that can be learned from it. The events, ideas, and
people of the past can have valuable lessons for the current day.
Another
aspect of my philosophy of history is that history is in a way the story of mankind.
It is important to remember that history is about real people and real events. When
learning about history and evaluating, it is important for historians to be
careful not to judge the people of history too harshly. Historical figures were real people who made
mistakes, so it is important to be objective when studying them. This is not to
say that were not evil or good people in history, but it is essential for the
historian not to idolize or demonize them.
No comments:
Post a Comment